Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2006-04-10 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2006-04-10 House Journal Page 3075 SB 210 The following, which was on the April 3, 2006, calendar and returned to the Rules Committee (page 2993), was read the second time: SENATE BILL NO. 210 "An Act relating to the manufacture and transportation of alcoholic beverages; relating to forfeitures of property for violations of alcoholic beverage laws; and relating to violations of alcoholic beverage laws." with the: Journal Page FIN RPT 4DP 4NR 2740 FN1: ZERO(DPS) 2740 RLS RPT HCS(RLS) NT 4DP 2NR 2986 TITLE CHANGE: HCR 39 2986 FN1: ZERO(DPS) 2987 **Representative Weyhrauch, who was excused (page 3053), left the Chamber. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: 2006-04-10 House Journal Page 3076 Page 3, line 5, following "AS 04.11.491": Delete "." Insert "; (7) a deadly weapon used in furtherance of a violation of this title; in this paragraph, "deadly weapon" has the meaning given in AS 11.81.900." Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Meyer objected. **The presence of Representative Croft was noted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 210 Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Elkins, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, LeDoux, Moses, Ramras, Seaton, Wilson Nays: Anderson, Dahlstrom, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Rokeberg, Stoltze, Thomas Excused: Salmon, Samuels, Weyhrauch Absent: Chenault And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: 2006-04-10 House Journal Page 3077 Page 3, line 5, following "AS 04.11.491": Delete "." Insert "; (7) a firearm used in furtherance of a violation of this title." Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that SB 210 am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. SB 210 am H was read the third time. The question being: "Shall SB 210 am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 210 am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Excused: Salmon, Samuels, Weyhrauch And so, SB 210 am H passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.